Steve, this is a very real issue — and yes, a provider directory error can qualify as a “material violation” for Special Enrollment under Covered California rules.

You’re dealing with what’s called a misrepresentation of provider network information. If Blue Cross showed Dr. Lee as in-network and she enrolled based on that — and now they’re saying Dr. Lee is not in-network — that can qualify.

Let me break this into 4 parts:

---

1️⃣ What Counts as a “Material Violation”

Covered California considers it a valid Special Enrollment trigger if:

• The plan materially misrepresented the provider network

• The enrollee relied on incorrect provider information

• The error affected the decision to enroll

• The issue is discovered after Open Enrollment ends

This falls under “error or misconduct by the health plan”.

---

2️⃣ How to Prove It Without Screenshots

No screenshots makes it harder — but not impossible.

Here’s what helps:

✔ Write a sworn statement (signed)

✔ Include timeline

✔ Include doctor’s office confirmation (if possible)

✔ Request Blue Cross provider directory history

You can also:

• Ask Blue Cross for the provider directory version from the enrollment date

• Ask Dr. Lee’s office for a written note confirming:

  • They were previously listed

  • They are not currently contracted

  • Or they stopped accepting the plan

Even a simple email from the office helps.

It does NOT have to be notarized, but signing it under penalty of perjury strengthens it.

---

3️⃣ Sample Letter to Covered California

You can submit this via upload through the Covered California account or fax.

---

Subject: Request for Special Enrollment Due to Material Violation – Provider Directory Error

To Covered California,

I am requesting Special Enrollment due to a material violation and misrepresentation of the provider network by Blue Cross.

On [DATE OF ENROLLMENT], I enrolled in a Blue Cross plan specifically because Dr. Lee was listed as an in-network provider in the plan’s provider directory and enrollment materials.

Maintaining access to Dr. Lee was a primary factor in my decision to select this plan.

After enrollment, I was informed that Dr. Lee is not in-network and/or is not contracted with the selected Blue Cross plan.

Had I known this information at the time of enrollment, I would not have selected this plan.

Because the provider directory was inaccurate or misleading at the time of enrollment, I respectfully request that Covered California grant Special Enrollment under the material violation provisions.

I am submitting this statement in good faith and under penalty of perjury that the information provided is true and correct.

Sincerely,
[Name]
[Address]
[Phone]
[Covered CA Case Number]
[Signature + Date]

---

If possible, attach:

• Any communication with the doctor’s office

• Any communication with Blue Cross

• A written statement explaining when the discovery occurred

---

4️⃣ Will They “Take Her Word For It”?

Sometimes yes. Sometimes they ask for documentation.

Covered California often evaluates:

• Consistency of story

• Timeline

• Whether the issue is credible

• Whether the request is made promptly

Notarization is usually NOT required.

A signed statement under penalty of perjury is stronger than a simple unsigned letter.

---

5️⃣ Extra Strategy (Important)

Have her also:

1. File a grievance with Blue Cross immediately.

2. Request a written response.

3. Ask Blue Cross for provider directory records from the enrollment date.

That creates a paper trail.

If Blue Cross admits the directory was inaccurate, Covered California almost always grants SEP.

---

Reality Check

Directory errors happen frequently.
Covered California does approve these — but it can take persistence.

If denied, you can:

• Request escalation

• Request appeal

• File complaint with Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) if it’s an HMO

---

If you’d like, I can:

• Tighten this into a one-page professional template you can give clients

• Or draft a version written more aggressively like an insurance broker would

Which style do you want — neutral and factual, or assertive and regulatory-based?

Good — neutral, factual, and legally grounded is exactly the right tone here.

Below is a professionally structured letter with statutory and regulatory citations that support a Special Enrollment request based on provider directory misrepresentation.

I’ll give you:

1. The letter (ready to use)

2. The legal citations explained

3. Documentation checklist

---

📄 Sample Letter to Covered California

Request for Special Enrollment – Material Violation (Provider Directory Error)

---

Subject: Request for Special Enrollment Due to Material Violation – Inaccurate Provider Directory

To Covered California Appeals and Eligibility Department:

I am submitting this request for Special Enrollment pursuant to applicable federal and state regulations allowing enrollment due to material misrepresentation or plan error.

On [DATE OF ENROLLMENT], I enrolled in a Blue Cross plan through Covered California. A primary factor in my decision to select this plan was that Dr. Lee was listed as an in-network participating provider in the plan’s provider directory and/or enrollment materials at the time of plan selection.

Maintaining continuity of care with Dr. Lee was material to my enrollment decision.

After enrollment became effective, I was informed that Dr. Lee is not in-network and/or is not contracted with this Blue Cross plan.

Had the provider directory accurately reflected Dr. Lee’s network status at the time of enrollment, I would not have selected this plan.

This constitutes a material misrepresentation of plan benefits and provider network status.

Accordingly, I respectfully request Special Enrollment under the following authorities:

• 45 C.F.R. § 155.420(d)(4) – Special Enrollment Period for material error, misrepresentation, or misconduct by the Exchange, HHS, or its instrumentalities.

• 45 C.F.R. § 155.420(d)(9) – Exceptional circumstances as determined by the Exchange.

• 45 C.F.R. § 147.200(a)(2) – Prohibition on misrepresentation of plan benefits.

• California Health & Safety Code § 1367.27 – Provider directory accuracy requirements.

• California Insurance Code § 10133.15 – Provider directory accuracy standards.

California law requires health plans to maintain accurate and up-to-date provider directories and prohibits materially misleading information regarding provider participation.

Because my enrollment decision relied upon incorrect provider network information, I respectfully request that Covered California grant a Special Enrollment Period to allow selection of a plan that includes my physician.

This request is made promptly upon discovery of the error.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Sincerely,

[Name]
[Address]
[Phone]
[Covered CA Case Number]
[Signature]
[Date]

---

⚖ Legal Authority Explained (for your understanding)

Here’s why those citations matter:

45 C.F.R. § 155.420(d)(4)

Allows Special Enrollment for:

“Material error, misrepresentation, or inaction by the Exchange or its instrumentalities.”

Plans participating in Covered California fall under this umbrella.

45 C.F.R. § 155.420(d)(9)

Gives Covered California discretionary authority to approve SEP for exceptional circumstances.

Directory errors often qualify here.

45 C.F.R. § 147.200

Prohibits material misrepresentation of:

• Benefits

• Coverage

• Provider participation

California Health & Safety Code § 1367.27

Requires:

• Accurate provider directories

• Updates within required timeframes

• Removal of providers no longer accepting patients

California Insurance Code § 10133.15

Parallel requirements for PPO insurers.

---

📎 Documentation Checklist to Attach

Even without screenshots, attach:

• Written statement explaining:

  • Date enrolled

  • Date discovered issue

  • Confirmation from doctor’s office (if possible)

• Any email from Blue Cross

• Any grievance filed with Blue Cross

• Screenshot of current directory (to show discrepancy)

---

🔎 Will They Take Her Word?

Covered California can approve based on sworn statement alone.

Notarization is NOT required.

But stronger cases include:

• Signed declaration under penalty of perjury

• Doctor office note confirming network status

• Grievance filed with plan

---

💡 Strategic Tip

Have her file a formal grievance with Blue Cross immediately and request written confirmation of Dr. Lee’s participation status on the enrollment date.

If Blue Cross acknowledges directory error, SEP is almost automatic.

---

If you’d like, I can also:

• Draft the grievance letter to Blue Cross
• Draft an appeal template if Covered CA denies
• Or create a one-page client-facing explainer you can use in your brokerage practice

What would be most helpful for you?